Within Australia
All orders ship freewithin Australia
Rest of the World
Orders over A$300
ship free worldwide
C1906
Plan Shewing Subdivision of Part of Grant of 90 ac to Nicholas Devine 8th Oct. 1799-Parish of Petersham. County of Cumberland-
Mapmaker:
Gullick
Plan of the grant and dispute over land in present day Erskineville and Newtown in the estate Nicholas Devine who had arrived in Sydney with the second fleet in 1790 to take up the position of superintendent of convicts. The map … Read Full Description
$A 650
Free Shipping
See Shipping page for Terms & Conditions
Details
Full Title:
Plan Shewing Subdivision of Part of Grant of 90 ac to Nicholas Devine 8th Oct. 1799-Parish of Petersham. County of Cumberland-
Date:
C1906
Mapmaker:
Gullick
Engraver:
John Sands
Condition:
In good condition, with folds as issued. Laid on archival linen.
Technique:
Lithograph printed in colour.
Image Size:
320mm
x 665mm
Paper Size:
355mm
x 710mm
AUTHENTICITY
Genuine antique
dated:
1906
Description:
Plan of the grant and dispute over land in present day Erskineville and Newtown in the estate Nicholas Devine who had arrived in Sydney with the second fleet in 1790 to take up the position of superintendent of convicts. The map covers the area from Angel Street, Erskineville Road, to Fiora and King Street.
In 1794 and 1799 he was given two adjoining land grants totalling 210 acres which covers most of today’s suburbs of Erskineville and almost all of Newton, east of King Street. In 1811, due to his old age, ailing health and deafness, Governor Macquarie pensioned him off. Devine and his wife Margaret (nee Smith), who was a convict of the second fleet, retired to their property which old Nicholas called Burrin after his birthplace. Margaret died in 1827 and two weeks later Devine signed over all of his land to one of his convict servants, Bernard Rochford, who immediately starts carving up the estate and selling it off. One of the first purchasers was the Reverend George Erskine, hence the suburb’s name. Nicholas Devine died in May 1830, his age listed as 104 although was more likely 94. Rochford himself, although still a convict, married a wealthy widow and proceeded to sell off chunks of the property, the price of which was now in its prime due to its proximity to the city. By 1835 the Rochfords had sold off all except for 10 acres around old Devine’s house which they lived in. The Rose of Australia Hotel on Erskineville Road now sits on the site. In 1839 Bernard Rochford died (aged 82) and his wife sold off the last of the old estate and leaves the area.
Meanwhile in Ireland, letters are being sent to the Colonial Office in London and Sydney from various Devines stating that Burrin Estate was theirs and they were soon coming to claim it. The Devine clan fought amongst themselves for a while until concluding that the heir was John Devine, Nicholas’s grand-nephew. While John Devine advised his family that he was the heir, he also told them that he did not want to pursue the matter as he had a profitable coach-building business in Liverpool (England). He even wrote to the colonial authorities warning them against errant claims from his Irish relatives. Eventually the Devine clan coerced John to sail with them to New South Wales and he arrived in 1846, lodging his claim 18 months later.
By this time the area was very established. Much of it had been cleared and was now dotted with some 30 residences belonging to some very prominent citizens including the Lord Mayor of Sydney, the attorney general, a couple of Parliamentarians, the editor of the Sydney Morning Herald, a few barristers and solicitors, a retired naval admiral and some importers and merchants. After a commission was sent to Ireland to establish John’s heirship, the trial commenced in April 1852. John Devine contested the will between Nicholas Devine and Bernard Rochford on three grounds. That old Nicholas was of unsound mind. This was partly due to his old age but was mainly attributed to being robbed and bashed by bushrangers in 1822. John Devine found many witnesses to testify how, particularly after the beating, old Nick was unable to dress himself or communicate, he dribbled incessantly and that he had to be spoon-fed. The will was a forgery. Some of the names are misspelt and one of the supposed signatories, a good friend of Rochford by the name of Francis Eagan, was not in the colony at the time of the will – and even his name was misspelt (Egan). One of the other alleged signatories, Thomas Dunn, also said that the signature on the will was not his. As Rochford was a convict he could not buy, own, sell or inherit property.
John Devine lost the case but upon his appeal (which went to London) he was granted a retrial, the London judges sitting on the appeal board stating that the verdict seemed against the weight of evidence. This retrial took place over 30 days in August and September 1857 and was at that time the largest civil court case in Australia’s history. Once again the status and connections of the defendants went against the Irishman. John Devine then threatened to appeal again but settled for an undisclosed payment. It is believed that the defendants knew that if a retrial was again ordered it would be held in a London courtroom and therefore their status in New South Wales would not be as persuasive.
John Devine died in 1883.
